Show ID:90413Episode ID:1064979

back

Time Author Message
2016-03-23 19:53glassman2Glad you are back Ed
Yes
western n c
2016-03-23 20:02Guest 4ok
2016-03-23 20:02glassman2I was reading your comment today on Rod Class Talkshoe click on your link and saw show for tonight.have listen to many past shows
how do we deal with these private for profit local courts
2016-03-23 20:06Guest 4please do not talk about any courts
ED
please do not talk about any courts
talk only about statius
talk only about status is everything
ED talk only about status is everything
no to courts
damm the courts
2016-03-23 20:09Guest 3If we are wards of the state, what is a lawful way to remove the guardians hands from us?
2016-03-23 20:09glassman2great
2016-03-23 20:10Guest 3Okay, thank you.
2016-03-23 20:10glassman2I agree guest 4
2016-03-23 20:10Guest 3Is a common law court same as a court of record?
Perhaps used as a "homonym"
With power to imprison also
I see.
Billy Thornton's discussion regarding "tribunal": Does that make sense to you?
It's been a long time, but I think it comprised: 1) judge/magistrate, who administer 2) claimant, who "controls" and 3) the jury (or something like..
something like that...
But you said, "Wearing the other hat"
I think that sums it up.
Comprises 3 parts.
I think the key thing is what you said, getting the judge to wear the other hat.
The last Billy Thornton I heard (~ 2 yrs ago) was discouraging.
Is not an Article III court a common law court?
No time like the present
You never know Ed, Guest 6 might be God
2016-03-23 20:24glassman2my great uncle signed the declaration of independence
George Walton from Georgia
2016-03-23 20:25Guest 3cool
Strictly, do you mean establish status or re-establish status?
Presumably, we have been regarded as wards from the beginning.
2016-03-23 20:28glassman2where do you get docs
2016-03-23 20:29Guest 3Our fathers were not there.
2016-03-23 20:31glassman2you got that right # 3
2016-03-23 20:33Guest 3I mean in terms of our individual circumstance, not as a race or people, that we have been regarded as wards from the beginning (i.e., at birth).
2016-03-23 20:33glassman2what is your email address Ed
2016-03-23 20:33Guest 3You must have faith
2016-03-23 20:34EdClanofChattandixie-1776@sbcglobal.net
2016-03-23 20:35Guest 3Ed, have you ever followed Albert Barcroft's work regarding Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act?
Okay, thanks.
If B is foreign to A, then A is foreign to B.
Is not a "true" American citizen foreign to the District of Columbia nation?
Okay, a corporate municipality, right?
Do the dejure States (e.g., State of New York, vs. New York State) even exist anymore?
It seems to me that the individuals who care enough to study this and pursue change of status will achieve it, in contrast to the vast majority who
are distracted with "bread and circuses".
2016-03-23 20:57Guest 4no good
2016-03-23 20:58glassman2Ed please send documents to bgs855@hotmail.com Your email address comes up as invalid when I try to send
2016-03-23 21:34Guest 12Sound is gone
2016-03-23 21:37Guest 3I hear you
2016-03-23 21:37snapeayes, can hear you
2016-03-23 21:37Guest 3You have not dropped off at all (at least here)
Interesting, how the 1802 Uniform Rule of Naturalization made it possible to allow an alien (i.e., foreign born) to become a "lawful citizen",
even after the 14th Amendment.
Ed, have you already achieved State citizenship?
2016-03-23 21:54Guest 13I'm following Ed but we spoke on phone-PaPaul
2016-03-23 21:55Guest 3Okay
2016-03-23 21:56EdClanofChattan972-598-3152
2016-03-23 21:56VigilanteI wasn't in from the beginning, but what progress did you make towards getting your county commissioners to fund a common law court in your county
2016-03-23 21:57Guest 3Ed, one of the prerequisites of the 1802 uniform rule of naturalization is that the alien must be "free". Presumably, a 14th-amendment citizen is free
What say you?
2016-03-23 21:57VigilanteI thought one needed the common law court to get the proper citizenship and that was going to be a strong reason to persuade them to start the court
2016-03-23 21:58Guest 13A 14th is not white
2016-03-23 21:58Guest 3READ the 1st sentence of the act: "That any alien, being a FREE white person..."
If we're not FREE, then we don't meet that "free" prerequisite.
CAUGHT IN A TRAP?
I'm playing devil's advocate...
Perhaps the word "free" is a homonym.
2016-03-23 22:00Guest 13He is free but the wrong people
2016-03-23 22:00Guest 3Like many words...
2016-03-23 22:07Guest 13What they have done is added noncriminal to criminal
Are you reading from the tweaked version
It's Paul
2016-03-23 22:21snapeaEd, did you say a Woman got her papers at federal court? If yes, can you tell some details?
2016-03-23 22:23Guest 3Thank you Ed - have a good night
2016-03-23 22:28glassman2thamks ed
email is working
yes
2016-03-23 22:30snapeathank-you
2016-03-23 22:33EdClanofChattanWelcome bro